Untitled Document
London Wildlife Trust, Skyline House, 200 Union Street, London SE1 0LX January 07, 2009
     
     
     
 
Planning for the wrong kind of future?
Monday, December 03, 2007


Despite last week’s welcome announcements from Gordon Brown that the UK needs to take a lead in developing a low carbon economy, his shake-up of the planning system does not appear to have this ambition as its central thrust.

The Planning Bill will speed up carbon hungry infrastructure projects

Whilst the Government has made some improvements to its reforms, the Wildlife Trusts are concerned that the Planning Bill - published today – will speed up proposals for the development of carbon-hungry infrastructure projects, such as airports and motorways. There is a clear need to plan for a less carbon-hungry future and one which puts restoration of our natural habitats centre stage.

 

As the local voice for wildlife, the Wildlife Trusts are closely involved in planning decisions across the UK, scrutinising 88,000 planning applications each year and responding to more than 7000. We are lobbying for a statement of national need for the natural environment, in line with proposed statements for energy, transport, waste and more.

Sustainable decision making needed

Stephanie Hilborne, chief executive of The Wildlife Trusts, says, "If the Government is intent on setting out how many new roads and airports the country 'needs' through its National Policy Statements, then it must demonstrate its commitment to climate change by planning for new infrastructure which protects and enhances the nation's 'Living Landscapes', our best adaptation asset".   The Wildlife Trusts think a National Policy Statement for the environment should underpin all Government planning policy. It would show where opportunities exist to provide high-quality habitat through infrastructure provision. 

 

Responding to climate change

As well as safeguarding people from the worst effects of extreme weather events, natural habitats give wildlife the room to manoeuvre in response to a changing climate.

According to Stephanie Hilborne, "This new system for approving major infrastructure projects, such as roads and airports, must include the power to reject environmentally damaging proposals. It must also include consistency in decision-making by different commissioners; openness and transparency, as well as full explanations of the reasons for refusing or approving schemes''.

Green infrastraucture is relevant

Stephanie adds "Our fragile ecosystems are our lifeline. In the absence of a strong and resilient network of natural areas for people and wildlife we jeopardise the ability of present and future generations to adapt to climate change. Green infrastructure is every bit as relevant and important to the economy and society as energy, transport and waste infrastructure. If anything, the future of our natural environment will determine economic success more than the number of motorways and airports".

 

 



 
Login |    Registered Charity Number 283895 Copyright 2007 London Wildlife Trust